Tuesday 5 June 2012

SITREP


The head of steam I had built up early last week was brought to a halt on Wednesday when Heather was made redundant.

22 years with the same company. A job she loves and is dedicated to, is now, for all intents and purposes over. The team she has built and nurtured, the friends that make her job so enjoyable on a day to day basis - all to go.

Regardless of being change managers ourselves, the effects of change, that sudden painful "What now?" reality check, is inescapable. Yes, you can be better prepared, you can understand how it will impact on you, how you will go through phases of emotional response etc, but you can't escape it.

Believe me, we are in a better position than many in a similar situation, so we aren't complaining. Funny thing is that I had the redundancy axe hanging over my head for two years and then 18 months of the threat of outsourcing, which I grasped as an opportunity. And that's where we are now. We may need to sell up, downsize, move in with her father, relocate entirely, or a combination of all these options. Whatever happens going forward, we have been given the impetus to review our combined skill sets and make sure we utilise them fully. This may take the form of multiple income streams to give us some protection against the winds of economic downturn and change. Who knows, Winter of '79 the 3 part ITV mini-series may now become a reality!

I am back at the paint-front today. Perhaps it's symptomatic of my inner feelings, but I'm building an Airfix Chieftain to turn into a wreck as W'79 scatter terrain. I've just been rusting up this old Airfix T34 for our Bakonga games as a test piece.... see the photo below.   


Both tanks are going to be mounted on Laser Cut Terrain Templates from East Riding Miniatures. I've got one template prepped with the first layer of basing material drying before I fix down the T34 hull. These Terrain Template packs are cracking good value, especially the medium size, and I thoroughly recommend them. ps (T34 largely complete now).

Been discussing rules with Maff and I really want to stick with Cold War: 1983. Most of our face to face gaming is done via Skype these days and we often have strict time limits of an hour, hour and a half, including chat and any show and tell.

Rather than limiting our hobby, the reverse is true. We specifically focus our games to maximise these windows of opportunity and are specifically targetting our figure and terrain collections to support this.

So, why Cold War: 1983? Well, we know the system inside out. We rarely have to refer to the book at all, so game play can zip along. Plus it's a versatile system and very easy to incorporate your own ad hoc mission/scenario specific rules.

It's not that CW:83 are necessarily better than any other rules, just in this case better suited to our current game play and the constraints we face. So I've formalised our game play with Cold War: 1983 into three distinct styles.

For small games, no more than half a dozen figures per side, we play the rules as is. Full granularity. We call this CW:83 CQB.

For Call of Duty: Modern Warfare/ Ghost Recon inspired games we have CW:83 Gaz's Rules. In this house variant, the SAS or other Special Forces figures are considered First Person Shooters (FPS), whilst any supporting troops and enemy forces are largely dealt with as fireteams, though there may be the odd FPS enemy sentry, leader or "boss" figure. In other words the enemy fireteam plays as a single entity.  This harks back to the 'Goon Squad' rules Maff originally conjured up in Cross of Iron.

For larger games, 3+ fireteams each, we have a further house variant CW:83 Fireteam. If you've played the video game  Full Spectrum Warrior, you'll understand where we are going with this. Here leaders lead whilst fireteams move and fight as a single element. Im just now adding in some ideas that have come out of gaming Force and Force and Hell and Uncivil Disorder to make CW:83 Fireteam sharper and a bit slicker for Skype play.

I should add that Maff and I have known each other since the early nineties. For us the game is more important than winning or losing, and sometimes we smooth game play for the sake of a fun game. We regard rules as an enabler rather than being simply immutable laws. But, it's still important to us that combat outcomes make sense and have logical results.

Apart from finishing off  miniatures I started last week, what's on the menu this week? Highlighting and bushes/tall grass clumps on some rock formations I've been painting for the Falklands, some distressed buildings.... but Land Rovers mostly.The aim is to complete four by the weekend. Six if I can get some bandage for camo nets.

Cheers
Mark

6 comments:

  1. Well, I hate to hear the bad news about your wife's job. Best of luck to you both on that front.

    On the other hand, I was glad to hear about your Skype gaming. I've a friend who had to relocate to the other end of Texas due to a new job, and we have been thinking about how to do an RPG over Skype. Could you drop me a line about how best to handle it? aethergraph AT gmail dott com.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks!

      Before I email, I'll just put together a quick guide based on our experience and pop it up as a post this week. That may answer many of your questions and provide ammunition for further discussion.

      Cheers
      Mark

      Delete
  2. Hello Mark,

    Been following the blog for a while now. Good work!

    Sorry to hear of Heathers bad luck. I am sure you both will cope with the future though.

    I posted on my own blog about yours, it should push more people over here for alternate universe fun. We have had a number of wargamers purchasing the USE ME Modern Warfare rules and quoting your blog as their inspiration.

    Regards,

    Gavin Syme
    Creative Manager 15mm.co.uk
    www.gavinsyme.co.uk

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks Gavin

    USE ME is a great little system. Adaptable, fast and fun. I've adapted myself it for several periods not yet covered by your current releases. Definitely has it's place on my tabletop and yes, even my desk at work.

    If there was any set of rules that encompasses all the elements of Winter of 79 it's USE ME, but we've not quite cracked the Cold War era and Counter-Insurgency stats yet for all forces involved. Still needs some off-line play testing. But when we do it will see more action here too.

    Cheers
    Mark

    ReplyDelete
  4. Like the wreak - I know I only ever seem to drop Royal Regiment of Weneye's when I (see!) comment here, but a couple - When I was a kid we used to drive past Chobham Ranges behind Deep Cut, and sitting in the bracken were various old targets; a couple of cruiser types (A13/Crusader), a T34, looking much as yours does and a large hull covered in scrub which I would come to realise was a Panther, but not until I was much older and they'd all been cleared for scrap.

    Despite the scrap-clear in the late 70's, enthusiasts did find and recover a Sherman a few years ago somewhere near the rail tracks at the back of the Medical barracks on Surrey Bends, which brings me to the 2nd 'When I'...while dicked to provide Fire Picket on field firing at Sennelarger, we were fruitlessly flapping our asbestos beaters when a Sherman loomed out of the smoke at us!

    When the smoke cleared we realised it was an old hulk which had been there since the end of the war. Whether it was dragged there as a target or had stopped there in '45 (there was a tank battle there apparently) I don't know, but it was a poignant reminder that we were there for a reason, and the taxpayer wasn't providing so that we could play Fireman Sam in someone else's Land Rover!

    Great Blog, I keep following...
    Hugh

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great personal experience Hugh!

      Cheers
      Mark

      Delete